Digital Camera RIP
19 March 2009 17:20![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It had to happen. After six countries, four years, extreme weather, drunk nights, and a whole shwack of bumps, dents, drops, cracks and even a fun couple of flirtations with 'teh ocean', my camera danced out of my pocket last night and landed unceremoniously on the floor, never to work again. The last time my camera dropped, it actually split open like a sandwich. I merely pressed it back closed with a scrunch and it worked again. Like some sort of Lazarus.
Not this time. I am a man. I did not weep.
If this camera was a cat, it would be on its 25th life. It earned this noble death.
It has been fun, Fujifilm Finepix Z1. You were pocket-sized and easy to carry around. Your unpretentious flat-black face, super fast start-up time, sliding-front-face activation panel and lack of extending lens made me feel like a secret-agent spy sometimes. Your steel bracket of a body kept yourself safe in my clumsy hands. Your giant-for-the-time viewscreen let me preview the pictures beautifully. Your simple and easy to understand interface let me take pictures that I wasn't embarrassed to post online.
I will mourn your passing. The iterations that came after you were not my style. They didn't have your class. Your panache. Your style.
So I am opening it up to the floor. Hey out there.
What's a good camera? Something similar to what I just described. I don't want no bulky, expensive SLRs. I want something sturdy and small.
Suggestions?
I also need a exterior portable hard drive if anyone has any suggestions.
tags
Not this time. I am a man. I did not weep.
If this camera was a cat, it would be on its 25th life. It earned this noble death.
It has been fun, Fujifilm Finepix Z1. You were pocket-sized and easy to carry around. Your unpretentious flat-black face, super fast start-up time, sliding-front-face activation panel and lack of extending lens made me feel like a secret-agent spy sometimes. Your steel bracket of a body kept yourself safe in my clumsy hands. Your giant-for-the-time viewscreen let me preview the pictures beautifully. Your simple and easy to understand interface let me take pictures that I wasn't embarrassed to post online.
I will mourn your passing. The iterations that came after you were not my style. They didn't have your class. Your panache. Your style.
So I am opening it up to the floor. Hey out there.
What's a good camera? Something similar to what I just described. I don't want no bulky, expensive SLRs. I want something sturdy and small.
Suggestions?
I also need a exterior portable hard drive if anyone has any suggestions.
tags
no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 01:43 (UTC)no subject
Date: 21 Mar 2009 22:12 (UTC)Try to find one that'll turn itself on/off with prolonged idle, so it doesn't spin your drive in a little fanless box the whole time it's on.
no subject
Date: 22 Mar 2009 00:15 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 01:59 (UTC)The Leica C-Lux 3 is a very stylish and pretty camera, though (: (I have a D-Lux-something, which is bulkier than you are looking for and takes great pictures. It's worth mentioning that Panasonic makes an equivalent camera called an FX37. It doesn't ooze style in the same way; but one of these is about a $400 camera, and the other is a $700 one.)
no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 17:37 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 17:39 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 02:05 (UTC)I haven't really looked at point-and-shoots but one of the sites I relied on during my SLR-research spree also has a round-up of the Best Digicams of 2008. It's possible some shiny new cameras have come out since then but probably not too many.
If you want to try and split the difference, or go more high-end, there's also a review of the Canon Powershot SX10. Judging from the specs it's pretty damn swank, and there's also a slightly smaller version, but it's not a spy camera.
no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 02:09 (UTC)Reading a bit further it looks like the Powershot is primarily for people who need telephoto-level zoom, and so probably a little overkill on all fronts.
no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 17:38 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 03:35 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 17:39 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 17:49 (UTC)http://community.livejournal.com/vancouver/4216961.html
Could be cool if you have some lights.
no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 18:06 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 18:23 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 20:00 (UTC)its mostly already there
no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 21:20 (UTC)no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 21:34 (UTC)odes are fun! sonnets can be fun spoken too, you could make this a sonnet
so bummed i can't be at cbc faceoff by the way
no subject
Date: 20 Mar 2009 22:24 (UTC)It's okay. It'll be on the radio.
no subject
Date: 21 Mar 2009 22:15 (UTC)no subject
Date: 22 Mar 2009 00:13 (UTC)